Search for: "Daily v. Scott*" Results 581 - 600 of 778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP)   Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360)   Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons)     Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
The Daily Beast's Shane Harris and Nancy A. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
The Daily Beast has the latest on the U.S. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:28 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and Considerations9th Circuit Considers Whether Hitting ‘Send’ Creates Agency – http://bit.ly/UCe1DL… [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am by Jack Sharman
His insights into how we fall from grace and face daily judgment are dark but powerful. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am by Broc Romanek
There is no particular SEC rule on this issue, but it is instead based on the holding in cases like FTC v. [read post]