Search for: "Day v. Block*" Results 581 - 600 of 5,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Saturday, 28 January 2023 marked data protection day. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 7:04 am by Michael Rosman
On December 16, 2022, the Second Circuit decided a case, Soule v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:43 am by Bob Ambrogi
It provides a straightforward answer of what is perhaps the oldest case on privacy, Griswold v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am by Cyberleagle
It brings to mind the comment of Lord Scott in Rusbridger v Attorney-General, a case about the moribund Section 3 of the Treason Felony Act 1848:“[Y]ou do not have to be a very good lawyer to know that to advocate the abolition of the monarchy and its replacement by a republic by peaceful and constitutional means will lead neither to prosecution nor to conviction. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Piepenbrock v London School of Economics and Political Science & Ors [2023] EWHC 52 (KB) by Heather Williams J. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
   Many reformers forged arguments and interpretations in the political arena that arose explicitly out of a politics of opposition to the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary, since the courts so frequently played the role of protecting landholding, slaveholding, corporate and financial elites—the oligarchs of their day—from the encroachments of democracy. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am by Dan Lopez
So, the old Vertical agreements block exemption that we’re talking about today, that was Retained EU Law, which is why it governed us until it lapsed last June. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In fact, the quote was fake, published four days earlier in a tweet by user @thereturnofBWA, whose Twitter bio states: “Everything I say is untrue and satire. [read post]