Search for: "Day v. Justice" Results 581 - 600 of 27,690
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In 2024,  the division bench comprising Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, delivered a significant judgment in the case of Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
Not long after ratification in 1869, Chief Justice Salmon P. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Comments on the NPR will be due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
  First, there was the controversial case of Banks v Cadwalladr – we reports  on the trial (Day 1, Day 2, Day 5) and a series of comments  on the judgment (here, here and here). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am by Norman L. Eisen
In December, Smith asked for 21 days between the Court granting cert and oral argument (per the U.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
Five days later, Brad texts and says he wants to hook up again. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am by Will Baude
"  On this assumption, it is very difficult to understand any clear and general statements of law that apply beyond the immediate politics of the day. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Company Terminates Long-Term Employee for Dishonesty In the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice case of Lagala v Patene Building Supplies Ltd., the plaintiff employee, “SL”, had been the Health, Safety and Training Manager for the defendant (“Pantene”), for more than 13 years when Patene terminated her employment for cause on December 18, 2019. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Company Terminates Long-Term Employee for Dishonesty In the recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice case of Lagala v Patene Building Supplies Ltd., the plaintiff employee, “SL”, had been the Health, Safety and Training Manager for the defendant (“Pantene”), for more than 13 years when Patene terminated her employment for cause on December 18, 2019. [read post]
The modern “reasonable expectation of privacy” or “REP” test as to whether Fourth Amendment protections apply was stated in Justice Harlan’s concurrence in Katz v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Only Justice Roberts dissented. [read post]