Search for: "Deas v. Deas"
Results 581 - 600
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2012, 8:41 pm
At least since the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 2:00 pm
This case (and its close cousin, United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
In other Supreme Court news, Peter Margulies assessed the oral arguments in Sessions v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Schedule V drugs are generally used for antidiarrheal, antitussive, and analgesic purposes. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
By contrast, Paul-Emile’s theory might suggest a revisionist reading of Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 1:45 pm
Florida v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
(Though on this one point, the UK DEA s 18 is even less restrictive than COICA, which requires the site to be blocked to be "offering goods and services" in violation of copyright law - which is not even to a lawyer a description that sounds very much like Wikileaks.)EDIT: Commenters have pointed out that official government documents in the US, unlike in the UK do not attract copyright. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
If approved, DEA rescheduling will probably follow; allowing many Americans legal access to MDMA for the first time. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 6:12 am
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) defines drug paraphernalia as “any legitimate equipment, product, or material that is modified for making, using, or concealing illegal drugs such as cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:35 pm
Last month, the Minnesota Court of Appeals decided State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:55 pm
Burrage v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 4:26 am
Adding to the mess, there is the problem of Pearson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
The fact that the DEA and the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:11 am
In Massachusetts, for example, our state high court ruled in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court made clear in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 12:17 am
See SEC v Jarkesy, 144 S. [read post]
