Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties" Results 581 - 600 of 1,438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 These factors generally include contractual language in insurance, consulting or brokerage, administrative services and other contracts presented by vendors for use in purchasing and maintaining the program that often shift responsibility for many duties an employer otherwise might assume would be born by the vendor. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:00 am
., 2017-Ohio-640, upholding the Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas’ dismissal of the complaint by the plaintiff-appellants Thomas Dundics and IBIS Land Group, Ltd. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 5:05 pm by Annemarie Bridy
The interesting question in this case is whose direct infringement Wullems can be said to have induced. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm by Jarod Bona
The Court, of course, ultimately rejected class certification for direct purchaser plaintiffs as well. [read post]
., holding two entities may be joint employers if one exercises either direct or indirect control over the terms and conditions of the other’s employees or reserves the right to do so, the concept of joint employment has generated increased interest from plaintiffs’ attorneys, and increased concern from employers. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:14 pm by Kluwer UPC News blogger
‘Article 62(2) of the UPC Agreement explicitly states that the UPC shall have the discretion to weigh up the interests of the parties and, in particular, take into account the potential harm to the defendant resulting from the granting of the injunction. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 10:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  [Is there an analogy here to bait-and-switch initial interest confusion? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:23 am by Kayla A. Haines, Esq.
Buy-Sell Provisions Most often, these provisions take the form of either: (1) an “appraisal” model, requiring an independent appraisal by a qualified expert as to the value of the interest to be purchased; or (2) the “shotgun” model, which permits one member to offer to purchase the interest of the other deadlocked member at a set price and terms, and the offeree must then either accept that price and terms, or purchase the… [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Mar. 30, 2017)The parties compete in the market for in-car video and surveillance systems (which makes the court’s conclusion below that they’re not competitors a bit odd—the court really seemed annoyed with the plaintiff’s arguments, which may have led it to stampede its conclusions). [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
This question points to an interesting strategy by the government. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:52 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” After this third-party complaint was filed, plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming ExtendLife as a defendant, asserting both a direct negligence and a third-party beneficiary breach of contract claim. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Among other things, the investigation also discovered “bribes used to fund improper payments to political parties, elected officials or other public officials. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:29 pm
Equity will even permit the reformation of a written instrument not only as between the original parties but also as to parties in privity with them [such as the original parties' successors in interest], unless the opposing party can demonstrate that he was a bona fide purchaser without knowledge of an encumbrance on the property. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:07 am
The only directions were upriver or downriver. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm by Eric Goldman
Plaintiff fails to draw a meaningful distinction between two interactive computer service providers who created a platform for advertising which contained misrepresentative material generated by third parties. [read post]
For further information about the EU’s Trade Secrets Directive, please see our webinar “New Year, New Progress: 2016 Update on Defend Trade Secrets Act & EU Directive. [read post]