Search for: "Discover Bank v. Wells" Results 581 - 600 of 810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 1:08 pm by Greg Mersol
Indeed, it found that the statute at issue in Thibodeau was “strikingly similar” to the one considered in the California Supreme Court’s Discover Bank case the Supreme Court had rejected in Concepcion. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
This is somehat different from the approach taken in Totalise v Motley Fool concerning whether an ISP should pay for its costs if opposing a Norwich Pharmacal order, and it is, in my view, the wrong decision. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
There was no factual record in Concepcion because of the categorical rule of evidence set forth in the Discover Bank case. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
The BAP sided with the trustee, rejecting the bankruptcy court's reliance on Citizens Bank of Maryland v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
 Perhaps they will somebody discover a planet where this all makes sense, but I wouldn’t get bank on it. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:00 pm by Jean Braucher
The Arizona Supreme Court currently has under review a mortgage documentation case, Vasquez v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:38 pm by George
Why don’t you wait until the money’s in the bank before you go blowing it on hookers and drugs, okay tiger. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am by Terry Moritz
  The Ninth Circuit, relying on a decision by the California Supreme Court in Discover Bank v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court did not expressly address the subpoena served on Bank of New York. [read post]