Search for: "Disposition Services LLC" Results 581 - 600 of 669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(Techdirt) Thomas Edison and National Inventors’ Day (Securing Innovation) (Patent Baristas)   US General – Decisions Los Angeles Superior Court jury finds founders of Blueprint Test Preparation breached non-compete contract with Robin Singh Educational Services (Law360)   US Patent Reform Patent reform 2009 (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (Intellectual Property Watch) Manufacturing Alliance sends letter on patent reform to… [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Roy Ginsburg
Id. at 579-80 (interpreting provision in an LLC agreement, which comported in large part with the Delaware statute on advancements, and asserting that retaining counsel for appearance before a grand jury was likely indemnifiable). ? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
BLANSHINE and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellees. 4th District.Civil procedure -- Service of process -- Condominiums -- Registered agent -- No merit to argument that service of process on registered agent of corporation qualified to transact business in Florida must comply with hierarchical provisions of section 48.081(1)(a)-(d)VERABELLA FALLS CONDOMINIUM, ASSOCIATION, INC. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that the Civil Service Reform Act barred such a suit brought by Jason Payne, a civilian employee of the Department of the Navy. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
We believe application of the so-called “Flatley rule” is dispositive here. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Manchester Pacific Gateway LLC (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 924: The agency’s discretionary authority, if it had any at all, was limited only to aesthetics. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305 [Municipal Services Agreement between city and tribe contained CEQA compliance clause and was not project approval triggering CEQA review].) [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Superior Court (Monex), 176 Cal.App.4th 1554 (2009);andnbsp;andnbsp; ATandamp;T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am by Aaron Tang
Hiro Aragaki – The lynchpin of Justice Scalia’s opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]