Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-50"
Results 581 - 600
of 4,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2016, 11:43 am
Thus, for offenses committed between October 1, 1994, and December 1, 1998, the review is still required. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
The applicable code sections are referenced below: §58-50-2(3) “Private probation” means the preparation of presentence investigation reports and the performance of supervision services by a private probation provider and funded by a court-ordered fee, to be paid by the defendant, pursuant to Section 77-18-1. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
The common questions were: (1) whether Defendants misrepresented that Trump University was an accredited university; (2) whether Defendants misrepresented that Donald Trump was heavily involved in TU and “hand-picked” the TU instructors; and (3) whether Defendants made misrepresentations about the “yearlong” mentoring and interactive support. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 1:09 am
The referring court observed that, according to the second sentence of Art. 38(1) UrhG, 50% of the the rights to remuneration belong the producer and 50% to the author of the film, provided that the producer of the film had not agreed otherwise with the author. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:55 pm
Defendant: Alison Aplin, Esq. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Bernardin allegedly thereby obtained access to Sewell's electronic communications and other personal information and sent messages purporting to be from her.On May 15, 2013, Sewell filed a separate suit against Bernardin's wife, Tara Bernardin, and `John Does # 1–5,’ apparently believing that Tara Bernardin and others unknown to her had gained access to her Internet accounts. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:07 am
” The policy imposes a duty on the insurer to defend “the insured against any suit seeking those damages. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
The District Court decided Evanston had no duty to defend. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 1:32 pm
“Ramiro Gonzales, 41, was executed by lethal injection at 6:50 p.m. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am
City of Glendale (1994) 8 Cal.4th 1, 8, fn. 3; Shoemaker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:43 am
It does all of these things, so in that sense it is not defective. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:20 pm
Although the court found that the complaint stated a cause of action against the defendant attorney because it met the three-pronged test of 1) the awareness of the defendant that its statements would be used for a particular purpose, 2) that the plaintiff was a known party who would rely on the statements in furtherance of that purpose, and 3) that the defendant had engaged in conduct linking it to the plaintiff (supplying the letter directly to it), the court… [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:21 am
Among the many claims made, the plaintiffs have asked for $50 million in general damages for the class, disgorgement of profits made by Thomson from the infringement, $1 million in punitive damages, litigation costs, and a permanent injunction from using the documents. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Unless cyber defenders drive real change now, the situation will worsen for another 50 years, or longer. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
The Court does not accept plaintiff's self-centered view that the public interest requires disclosure to [it] of the list sought. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:38 pm
That entry results in a $50 cost. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:48 pm
R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:51 am
Defendant does, however, cite Cash v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
A Class-4 felony is punishable by 1-3 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $25,000.00 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-45; 5/5-4.5-50 Because the defendant was also convicted of aggravated DUI, the sentence for leaving the scene cannot run concurrent with the aggravated DUI conviction but must be served separately (consecutively). 730 ILCS 5/5-8-4(d)(4) Judge Zappa sentenced the defendant to 2 years for this offense. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 12:55 pm
You have the right to defend yourself. [read post]
