Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 581 - 600 of 12,185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Couldn’t we look at it through the interests of the living? [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:04 am by Alex Phipps
When the victim answered, defendant told her “[i]f you’re still in Asheville, I’m gonna try and send you some money,” and “I got $1,000 for ya. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The objection of forum non conveniens does not apply in the Brussels I Regulation system (as clarified in the CJEU’s Owusu decision). [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Scott H. Kimpel
There, that court found that, “[w]hereas … [i]nstitutional [b]uyers reasonably expected that [the defendant crypto-asset company] would use the capital it received from its sales to improve the [crypto-asset] ecosystem and thereby increase the price of [the crypto-asset],” those who purchased their coins through secondary transactions had no reasonable basis to expect the same. . . . [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
As a general rule, Supreme Court Justices speak through their opinions. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court reasons instead that plaintiff's lawsuits were not acts of free speech:"Flynn I and II sought redress for Plaintiff’s demotion and other forms of retaliation and to secure personal relief for Plaintiff through monetary and injunctive relief. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
I am prepared to go to court to make sure this election is not stolen and am directing the Justice Department to defend federal election law accordingly. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
This conclusion does not mean, as Judge Young put it, that companies must “confess to wrongdoing. [read post]