Search for: "Doe v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 581 - 600
of 765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
The Company does not have a Chairman of the board. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Cir. 2011) (en banc): The dissenting opinion (Patent Docs) CAFC finds re-examined claims of U.S. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
In this regard, Para 3.4 (v) of the said Manual reads as follows:"(v) In cases of alleged sex offences such as intercourse with a female child, forcible rape, indecent liberties or perversion, it is important that the victim, as well as the accused, be made available for interview and polygraph examination. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:08 am
Upon the completion of such examination the medical board shall report and certify to the board whether such beneficiary is or is not totally or partially incapacitated physically or mentally and whether he or she is or is not engaged in or able to engage in a gainful occupation. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:34 am
KSR Int’l Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:50 am
The “Pickering test” [Pickering v Board of Education, 391 US 563] is used to determine if a public employee has been unlawfully dismissed from his or her employment for “engaging in speech. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:36 pm
Bonenberger submit to an independent medical examination and Mr. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:44 am
American Board of Internal Medicine v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 2:44 pm
" It's hard to believe they would cite the PCLOB; no oversight is "already conducted" by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board since the PCLOB does not actually exist. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
Whether there was substantial evidence to support the Board’s final decision. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:45 am
On May 24, after two physicians examined him and concluded that he could not return to work, Aguilera's attorney requested that he be examined by a board certified urologist. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
” Unless, said the court, there is clear evidence that the Legislature intended otherwise, the presumption is that all terms and conditions of employment are subject to mandatory bargaining.In addition to making the initial determination, Section 207-c gives the employer the exclusive right to appoint a physician to examine a sick or injured officer, to prescribe and provide medical or surgical treatment if indicated, and to issue an initial back-to-work order if the… [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
(PatLit) (IP:JUR) ‘Damages for infringing invalid patents’: a comment (PatLit) The inescapable trap enlarged: EPO Technical Board of Appeal decision in Unilever v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The Court has examined the concept of Public Interest Litigation as prevalent in other countries. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 4:15 am
”The court noted that “A municipality is entitled to order medical examinations of a firefighter who is receiving benefits and direct the employee to return to light duty work if medically able (see General Municipal Law § 207-a [1], [3]). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
In Mayo Foundation For Medical Education and Research v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:20 am
”The court distinguished fibromyalgia from other diseases that courts have recognized as having a constitutionally-protected privacy right such as the medical condition of individuals with HIV [see Doe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
The mere fact that the privileged medical records may be relevant to Young’s claim for negligent entrustment does not mean that the medical records are discoverable. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
The petition was Boulder County Board v. [read post]
