Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants" Results 581 - 600 of 7,903
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Todd Presnell
GEA Process Eng’g, Inc., 2016 WL 1238785 (WDNY Mar. 30, 2016)). [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:14 am by Todd Presnell
GEA Process Eng’g, Inc., 2016 WL 1238785 (WDNY Mar. 30, 2016)). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:48 pm
It should be noted, that plaintiff's contention of falsity of the evidence supplied by defendants to the police, i.e., that, some of the information provided by defendants turned out to be not true, since at trial, out of 316 counts she was convicted only of 146, does not vitiate the existence of probable cause. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:41 am by David Clark
  In a November 17, 2015 letter to Congress, over 30 law professors raised a variety of concerns regarding the Defend Trade Secrets Act, including many that were previously raised in opposition to the 2014 version of the Defendant Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:41 am by David J. Clark
  In a November 17, 2015 letter to Congress, over 30 law professors raised a variety of concerns regarding the Defend Trade Secrets Act, including many that were previously raised in opposition to the 2014 version of the Defendant Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press was sealed on 30 October 2013. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 11:56 am by emagraken
  [12]      Reasonable equality does not mean that the defendant should be able to match expert for expert or report for report . [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:39 am by Colin Miller
The rape shield law was not designed to protect against a defendant from being able to raise a theory of defense that goes to an element of the offense, which this does. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:50 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Previously, the window for removal has been narrowly construed, with federal court removal allowed only within 30 days of:  1) the filing of the complaint indicating federal jurisdiction or, 2) the receipt from plaintiff of a document supporting removal. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:50 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Previously, the window for removal has been narrowly construed, with federal court removal allowed only within 30 days of:  1) the filing of the complaint indicating federal jurisdiction or, 2) the receipt from plaintiff of a document supporting removal. [read post]
16 May 2014, 11:41 am by Stephen Bilkis
A Suffolk Marijuana Possession Lawyer said that, at about 10:30 p. m. on the night of December 1, 1978, two police officers on routine patrol in the parking lot of a shopping center in Bay Shore observed the defendant walking erratically toward a car. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
A first-time class 1 misdemeanor DUI conviction also requires the license to drive be suspended for 30 days, followed by a restricted license for traveling to work or school for 60 days before the license can be reinstated at the defendant’s expense. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:17 pm
 Rule 1(5) seeks to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every proceeding on its merits. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
On January 31, 2020, defendant notified Doe that it was initiating a Title IX investigation against him as a result of that incident. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:03 am by Daniel Richardson
  Defendant was stopped by a state trooper for going 30 miles above the speed limit. [read post]