Search for: "Does 1-39"
Results 581 - 600
of 5,133
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2007, 11:57 am
In footnote 1 of that opinion, the Ninth Circuit held that as long as the plaintiff has at least one registered copyright, a district court had jurisdiction to enjoin infringement of the plaintiff's registered and unregistered copyrights, because "section 411 does not limit the remedies a court can grant. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
On or after July 1, 2025, AB 39 will prohibit a person from engaging in digital financial asset business activity without a license from Department of Financial Protection & Innovation. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 6:11 am
How Long Does a Lawyer Need to Prepare and File a Bankruptcy Petition? [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 7:08 am
In the district, several properties had multiple owners with an interest ranging from 1/13 to 1/3 of the parcel. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:15 pm
and (2) to cover their ass**s if something does go down. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:10 pm
But even if the result of the first appealed lawsuit is that Section 82.00651(c) does not apply to the mere sending of a solicitation letter, it may still apply to the sending of misleading or unfair letters. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:36 am
" (p. 39).And so the Board affirmed the genericness refusal and the alternative Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: In one of the four related cases, the Board affirmed the refusals, but allowed registration with a disclaimer of BOOKING.COM for the following mark:Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Stanley, Case No. 1D14-1190, 39 Fla. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 7:44 am
And, if so, is there a GATT Article I:1 problem? [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:29 am
What does "non-taxable" alimony mean? [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:11 am
.): 25 Greenwoods Motion for Summary J + Tribal Appellate Court Decision 27 State Farm Motion for Summary J 27-1 Tribal Court Complaint 27-3 State Farm Tribal Court Motion to Dismiss 37 Greenwood Response 38 State Farm Response 39 State Farm Reply 42 MJ Order An excerpt: In summary, the court concludes that the tribal court does have jurisdiction over the Greenwoods’ claims against State Farm. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:40 pm
Stanley, Case No. 1D14-1190, 39 Fla. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:09 am
Christopher Slobogin (University of Florida - Levin College of Law) has posted Lying and Confessing (Texas Tech Law Review, Vol. 39, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:28 pm
"But even if she has only a 1 per cent chance of survival, does it give them the right to take that chance away from her? [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
As currently negotiated, the CAFTA does not require that CAFTA countries continue to improve their labor laws to conform with basic international labor standards--in fact, it does not require that the countries' laws meet any standard, or even that the countries have a law relating to the basic standards. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:27 am
Guarantees of Freedom of Religion are stated in UU no. 39 Year 1999 on Human Rights, which in § 22(1) states that: “everyone is free to adhere to their religion and to worship according to their religion and belief. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:47 pm
(FAQ 39) This guidance builds on a blog post published by the FTC's Chief Technologist, Steve Bellovin. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 5:33 pm
The word “designed” does not require the Crown to prove the accused’s subjective intention. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:18 am
Even if you accept that it is important to address U.S. criticisms, that still does not justify the Canadian DMCA. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
Potential Challenges: The statute does in fact present several issues under the U.S. [read post]
