Search for: "Does I through Doe III"
Results 581 - 600
of 6,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2012, 2:52 pm
Blogs listed below may be "IPKat-approved", which does not mean that the IPKat actually approves of their content but that (i) this Kat provides some technical and logistical assistance as well as content and that (ii) the blogs do not carry paid-for advertising, pop-ups, banners, small ads via Adsense and so on. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:17 pm
The notice does not say when FDA plans to propose regulations implementing the amendment. [read post]
23 May 2016, 7:04 am
The Sunset report concludes that the tiered structure for the amount of blanket bonds required by operators does not account for the risk of well abandonment. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:35 am
What does that make us? [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:19 am
NY does not require a price premium theory. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:46 pm
I’m not sure I buy Goodwin-Gill’s definition of “modern statehood” as requiring ”democracy, representative government, and accountability.” But he does raise a fascinating problem and challenge for the Palestinian statehood movement. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:36 pm
Our beloved federal courts (aka Article III courts) are part of our federal government. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 3:27 am
Earlier this week I posted a link to Pluralism and Public Legal Reason. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am
§ 1003.30 does not support DHS’ argument, because it does not allow amendment of the date and time on the notice to appear by using a Form I-261. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:51 am
Title I of FISA is the exclusive statutory means through which the government can directly surveil any USPERs within the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:49 am
(iii) Permitted transfers. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Pace III and Kevin C. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 4:19 am
I had the pleasure of testifying in the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
I didn’t make it through Hilary Mantel’s acclaimed book Wolf Hall because I couldn’t tell all the Thomas’ apart. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
[i] The Court, relying on the recent decision Associated Press v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:04 am
No. 29164-2-III State v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:05 pm
Ray III. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:37 pm
Harvie Wilkinson III, I think it’s safe to describe him as one of the leading contemporary advocates of judicial restraint on the federal appellate bench. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:03 pm
I presume neither does the employer. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:59 am
One can readily imagine an environment that is quite similar to conditions from late 1998 through mid-2001, except this time with (i) far more clarity with respect to permission to use lethal force, (ii) far more intelligence about who is who in theater, and (iii) far more familiarity with the available proxy forces. [read post]
