Search for: "Dunn v. Dunn" Results 581 - 600 of 1,539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2017, 5:05 pm by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Dunn, No. 16-5294, involves a question regarding the degree of independence needed for appointed mental health experts under Ake v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Dunn, No. 16-5294, involves a question regarding the degree of independence needed for appointed mental health experts under Ake v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
Section 4 had been discussed in Barron v Vines [2015] EWHC 1161 (QB) (29 April 2015), and Yeo v Times Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWHC 3375 (QB) (25 November 2015), but Economou v de Freitas is the first time it has been successfully invoked. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm by Kate Howard
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
The first lawsuit to reach a merits hearing on a constitutional challenge to the Texas Advance Directives Act is scheduled for trial starting January 6, 2017. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
Dunn 16-602 Issues: (1) Whether, to satisfy his Glossip v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by INFORRM
” The Court referred to a 19th century House of Lords decision: Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67, expressing a principle which should be obvious to anyone in adversarial legal practice: “… I have always understood that if you intend to impeach a witness you are bound, whilst he is in the box, to give him an opportunity of making any explanation which is open to him; and, as it seems to me, that is not only a rule of professional practice in the conduct of a case,… [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Delaware Says “No” to Director’s Books & Records Request Every now & again there’s a case that isn’t likely to have a big practical impact, but is worth noting just because it exists – and the Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in Bizarri v. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Carani, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd.: WD Wash, Milo & Gabby v. [read post]