Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 3,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 1:59 pm
In 2016, the US Supreme Court issued an opinion on Hursts v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 5:53 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled on the issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:46 am
The Court of Appeal has in Youell v La Reunion [2009] EWCA Civ 175 confirmed that, in light of the important West Tankers decision of the European Court of Justice, (see here) the arbitration exclusion to the Brussels I Regulation will be narrowly applied by the English courts. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
In England and Wales, section 9 of the Defamation Act 2013 provides that a court does not have jurisdiction to hear an action against a person not domiciled in the UK, EU or a Lugano Convention state “unless the court is satisfied that, of all the places in which the statement complained of has been published, England and Wales is clearly the most appropriate place in which to bring an action in respect of the statement”. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (Admin) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has ruled that the employment of an army chaplain involves a “a special bond of trust and loyalty” between employee and state such that the full panoply of fair trial rights under Article 6 could not apply. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
England, Sandra M. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:27 pm
England, Sandra M. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:08 am
In The Hilb Group of New England, LLC v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 1:15 pm
So California generally does what England does.But here's the thing. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing) Earlier this year, the Supreme Court heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early 2009. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 6:32 am
Case Citation: State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:35 pm
See, Morgan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 4:18 pm
As Julian Knowles J stated, Part 11 is concerned with issues of personal jurisdiction, such as whether a claim form has been served properly. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:14 am
The Sarum Rite concert, as the name suggests, focused on the music characteristic of Catholic worship in England during the Tudor Period. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 4:34 am
If legality of business were the standard, then “any cybersquatter that conducted a lawful business could always find refuge,” The New England Vein & Laser Center, P.C. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 2:13 am
The Court of Appeal held that Argentina was protected by state immunity. [read post]
