Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 1,547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm by Cicely Wilson
Co., New York Court of Appeals (6/11/13)Contracts, Insurance, Securities LawIn 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) notified Bear Stearns & Co. and Bear Stearns Securities Corp. of its intention to charge Bear Stearns with violations of federal securities laws. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
  In state court, the traditional Pennsylvania version (based on Azzarello v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:09 am by Chip Merlin
Following graduation, he was given a direct commission in the United States Navy through its Law Education Program. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:40 am by Andrew Wooley
Gore, 517 U.S. 559, 568 (1996), and subsequently refined in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Sagamore Insurance Co. as the third and final act (following on the two acts of Toller v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am by Jon L. Gelman
 The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution did not preempt a NJ compensation judge from ordering an insurer to pay for prescribed medical marijuana to relieve the residuals of chronic pain following from a work related back injury. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm by Sara Bodnar
According to the contributors to a new book, Liberty’s Nemesis: The Unchecked Expansion of the State, the growth of the federal administrative state in the United States poses a threat to American democracy. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In New York, prior to 2012, the process of drawing district lines was entirely within the purview of the legislature,[FN1]subject to state and federal constitutional restraint and federal voting laws, as well as judicial review. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
In New York, prior to 2012, the process of drawing district lines was entirely within the purview of the legislature,[FN1]subject to state and federal constitutional restraint and federal voting laws, as well as judicial review. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“The United States must comply with all the terms of the agreement,” Richards said. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Matt Pulle
  This exception is called the “futility doctrine,” and it is recognized by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (the circuit that includes all the federal courts in Tennessee). [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Matt Pulle
  This exception is called the “futility doctrine,” and it is recognized by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (the circuit that includes all the federal courts in Tennessee). [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am by William C. MacLeod
[The 14th entry in our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a guest post from Bill MacLeod, a former Federal Trade Commission bureau director and currently a partner with Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, where he chairs the firm’s antitrust practice and co-chairs its consumer protection practice. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am by Gene Killian
Another tool for policyholders in state court (but not federal) is the Offer of Judgment rule, R. 4:58. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 8:59 am by Gene Killian
Another tool for policyholders in state court (but not federal) is the Offer of Judgment rule, R. 4:58. [read post]