Search for: "For a Song, Inc"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,712
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2015, 1:51 am
At that time Marley was under contract to a New York company called Cayman Music Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
song "No Woman, No Cry". [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:48 am
BMI is born In 1939, at the radio industry’s annual meeting ,the broadcasters founded a new collective management organisation, Broadcast Music Inc or BMI. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:42 am
Entertainment Inc. and DC Comics Inc. over the rights for the acclaimed superhero is hading back to court. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
Corning Inc., et al., 2015 WL 6482374 (E.D. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:47 am
As General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Business Development, of Franklin Electronic Publishers Inc., Greg served in many roles for a multinational consumer electronics company based in New Jersey, including heading up business development and directing research and development (R&D) in creating one of the world’s first handheld e-book readers. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
Bridgeport Music, Inc., No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 4:14 am
The verdict against Las Vegas-based Rimini Street Inc. and CEO Seth Ravin followed a two-week trial in U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
After years of litigation and undoubtedly hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees (perhaps more), the Court concluded that the lyrics to the song “Happy Birthday” were never actually transferred to Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., the current troll that had been forcing us all to sit through awkward and unsettling performances of “original” songs during birthday feasts at our favorite chain restaurants. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:00 am
Ann, Inc., 2013 WL 5352969 (S.D. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
Universal Amusement, Inc. (1980); and the prior restraint doctrine is applicable to restrictions imposed by universities, see Healy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Recently in Automattic Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:33 am
The case has since reached its newest milestone, which will be cause for celebration for many, and a loss for the few.For the uninitiated, the case of Rupa Marya v Warner/Chapell Music Inc dealt with the aforementioned song "Happy Birthday to You", which was created by the Hill sisters, Mildred and Patty, in the late 1800s (although only in melody). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
Warner/Chappell Music, Inc., No. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:39 am
YouTube, Inc. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 7:46 am
Recently the Central District Court of California ruled that no copyright protection exists for the popular “Happy Birthday To You” song after several decades of dispute.[1] Marya, involved a class action suit against Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
” The owner of the GATORADE mark, Stokely-Van Camp, Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 1:35 pm
MCA Records, Inc. (9th Cir. 2002), which held that a band’s commercial release of the song “Barbie Girl” — which criticized Barbie — didn’t infringe Mattel’s trademark. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
The reason is that from 1988 until yesterday Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. had been demanding royalties on the lyrics to the song. 1988 was the year Warner/Chappell purchased purchased Birchtree Ltd., the purported owner of the copyright in the lyrics, for an estimated $25 million, placing an estimated value on the Happy Birthday To You portion of the purchase at a reported $5 million. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
The reason is that from 1988 until yesterday Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. had been demanding royalties on the lyrics to the song. 1988 was the year Warner/Chappell purchased purchased Birchtree Ltd., the purported owner of the copyright in the lyrics, for an estimated $25 million, placing an estimated value on the Happy Birthday To You portion of the purchase at a reported $5 million. [read post]
