Search for: "Foster v. California"
Results 581 - 600
of 759
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm
By cobbling together a limited ruling that granted a Catholic foster-care service a highly fact-dependent exemption from a Philadelphia policy requiring foster agencies to work with same-sex couples, Roberts managed to avoid an outcome that would have overturned the long-standing precedent in Employment Division v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm
IPSO – 11214-21 Zaman v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation – 10225-21 A man and a woman v Ardrossan & Saltcoats Herald, 2 Privacy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach – after investigation – 11065-21 Keenan v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 10:49 am
A similar result was reached by the California Court of Appeals in 2005 in Anderson, McPharlin & Connors v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[10] In enacting the ICWA, Congress declared its policy to be the protection of the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimal Federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing for assistance to Indian tribes in the operation… [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
June 22, 2016) (applying California law in its DTSA analysis). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am
California Teachers Association, 14-915, another case affirmed by an equally divided Court. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
In a recent case, Joao Control & Monitoring Systems of California, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
The Impact Of Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
This right is premised upon the recognition that public monitoring of the courts fosters important values such as respect for the legal system. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 3:15 am
AOL the key decision on Section 230 immunity https://t.co/SWfcCBaTZf 2017-11-19 US court thumbs its nose at Supreme Court of Canada: Google v Equustek https://t.co/JQyDGCljeL 2017-11-19 There is no internet freedom without responsibility https://t.co/WM631G9lw5 2017-11-19 "The Commercial Usenet Stinks on All Sides," Anti-Piracy Boss Says – TorrentFreak https://t.co/XZ43GSFo6S 2017-11-19 California Court to Supreme Court of Canada: F*** You (paraphrasing) | Allen… [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 2:40 pm
Comer, Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:00 am
Smith, 2020 ONSC 2782, R v Roberts, 2020 ABPC 99, Rodrique Levesque et al v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Nor does it make sense for the Court to warn schools – for the third time, after University of California Regents v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:26 pm
Menkel-Meadow teaches at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. [read post]
1 May 2020, 2:04 pm
North American Olive Oil Ass’n v. [read post]
