Search for: "Friday v. Friday" Results 581 - 600 of 13,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2022, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
” Copyright of Software API — Patently-O’s Dennis Crouch previews arguments made this week in SAS Institute v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  (Here in Ohio, the Supreme Court’s 1975 decision in Columbus v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the Supreme Court requested supplemental briefing in Jennings v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At CNN, Joan Biskupic observes that Beckles v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Next month’s oral argument in King v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:54 am by Amy Howe
Last week’s announcement that the Court will review King v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Marissa Miller
Shawn Turner at Hotel News Now previews RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:06 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh previews Monday’s installment of C-SPAN’s “Landmark Cases” series, which will focus on Brown v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:22 pm by Kathryn Hughes
Today's issue of Fat Friday contains these articles: Fred Kruck, a Lawyer's Take on Traditional Legal Software Versus Web Applications Barron Henley, Review: Webex v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 3:45 am
 A couple of weeks ago, the Supreme Court had arguments in Pottowattamie County v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 9:30 am
The IPKat is a great admirer of Lord Neuberger, whose dissenting judgment in Coflexip v Stolt Offshore he rates as one of the finest patent judgments he has ever read.Thanks are due from the IPKat to Laurens Kamp (Simmons & Simmons), for this entertaining article about whether cats are left- or right-pawed. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 4:05 pm
First there is J.Choo (Jersey) Ltd v Towerstone Ltd, a 16 January 2008 decision of Mr Justice Floyd on infringement of Community registered and unregistered rights in handbags in which the judge affirmed that there was no defence of innocent infringement but refused to give injunctive relief when the infringing defendant gave a pepetual undertaking not to infringe again. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:19 am
And finally, more details on the IRS v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:07 am
Another Chancery Division appointee with some IP experience is Philip Sales QC who, as a deputy judge, rendered the decision in the Dr Snuggles case; previously he was the Mystery Judge in Tesco Stores v Elogicom. [read post]