Search for: "Gange v. Gange" Results 581 - 600 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 7:27 am by Eugene Volokh
” That, too, would be unconstitutional, though under the Fourth Amendment: As the court held in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:11 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 One summer day a few years back, when I had just cleared the facility, a gang fight broke out in the yard which led to warning shots being fired from the gun tower and a 2-day lockdown.Last month, the Michigan Court of Appeals decided a case involving the MDOC's attempt to get to the bottom of those gang disputes. [read post]
5 Jul 2005, 8:52 am
But now the issue has arisen in a particularly stark form, the one that Roger predicted, in People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 8:25 am
I am delighted to serve as a guest on Prawfs, and I want to thank Dan and the rest of the gang for the invitation. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 12:59 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Minihan (brief); Joanna Labastida (argue)Improper consolidationImproper line-up identificationImproper admission of gang evidenceImproper eyewitness ID instructionState v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:37 am by Kevin Sheerin
In the Matter of Mark Scott v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al. [read post]
Worse, given the 2014 influx of Central American children to our border, refugee protection and human rights experts reported that large numbers of children fled brutal sexual and gang-related violence. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 6:45 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Whalen[Affirmed; Beier; July 21, 2017]Improper admission of gang affiliation evidenceProsecutorial errorImproper transmission of pro se discovery motion to defense counsel [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Samuel Reed, No. 106,807 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal (petition for review); Attempted first-degree murderRichard Ney[Affd/Vacd; Beier; June 19, 2015]Public trial violationImproper vouchingImproper admission of gang evidenceProsecutorial misconductState v. [read post]