Search for: "Generes v. Justice Court (People) (1980)"
Results 581 - 600
of 728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Or is it a favored strand of Supreme Court case law that is in jeopardy? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
Comm’n (1980). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm
(David Bernstein) In comments to some of my recent posts, some commenters have suggested that few people nowadays get especially worked up about Lochner v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:33 am
Under vouchers, the prison system would come within Zelman v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:34 am
While examining the judicial pronouncements on the subject Justice T.S. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:00 am
Whilst the Calcutt Committee was deliberating the case of Kaye v Robertson ([1991] FSR 62) came before the Courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:07 pm
Whilst the Calcutt Committee was deliberating the case of Kaye v Robertson ([1991] FSR 62) came before the Courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 8:20 am
They expose unfairness through an absurdly inflated situation generated by a particular decision or law. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
Because generally there is no other court where advocacy can wield more far-reaching influence than the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
The Commonwealth petitioned a single justice of this court arguing that the motion judge erred, as a matter of law, in granting the defendant’s motion. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
And you are also saying that the Patent Office is out of control, not through its own fault, but there are too few people and too many inventions. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
In 1980, Congress enacted the Medicare Secondary Payer Provision (“MSP”) which made Medicare a secondary payer plan. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
His approach was markedly different from the established approach in a duty/interest case, particularly where there is a pre-existing relationship between publisher and publisher: compare, eg, Horrocks v Lowe [1975] AC 135 HL and Kearns v General Council of the Bar [2003] 1 WLR 1357 CA. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 8:53 am
Topic: ... -------- Joseph Laronge, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice: Laronge has been a trial and appellate attorney for 35 years. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Many people know that in Buck v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:35 am
” (U.S. v. [read post]
