Search for: "Grace v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2015, 8:17 am
Stewart v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am
The Professor last graced this blog with a guest post in March 2015 on the subject of veiling piercing and LLCs. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:28 pm
Why was nothing done to address the threats directed towards Grace and the rest of [Feminists United] BEFORE THIS TRAGEDY? [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm
Over at the Times, President Jimmy Carter urges states involved in the Syrian conflict to push for a political solution and calls for five-way negotiations between the United States, Turkey, Russia, Iran, and the Syrian regime. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
Supreme Court decision, Baker v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 4:11 am
Grace, 461 U.S. 171 (1983); Watts v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 1:20 pm
Grace Period: The WP29 stated that if no “appropriate solution” is found by the end of January 2016, and depending on its ongoing assessment of the remaining data transfer tools, EU data protection authorities may take necessary steps, which may include bringing enforcement actions. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am
In a decision with significant potential ramifications for flows of personal data from the European Union to the United States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14) that the Safe Harbor Decision no longer provides adequate protection for data transferred between the EU and the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:00 pm
To begin, the Ninth Circuit specifically concluded that the United States Supreme Court decision in NCAA v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., Bank Melli Iran v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 12:31 am
It seems to me that is not the most desirable state of affairs. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:29 am
It is only by the grace of the state that an exemption is granted, and the state only governs by the grace of God. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:23 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
”) State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 6:48 am
Supreme Court’s opinion in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 12:09 am
No, it seems it is you that are confused about "marriage' that churches will perform with marriage on behalf of her employer, not me.Well, I can see that we disagree as to who is confused, but beyond that, you do not explain your position further, so you have given me nothing to which to reply (except as you take up this subject again, later in your response as quoted below).You don't need to remind me of Plessy v Ferguson, and, as you say it was 'upheld' by… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
See Grace United Methodist Church v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 1:57 pm
In the case of Cote v. [read post]
