Search for: "Grand Jury Matter, in Re"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2008, 9:16 pm
Here, the senator cited the example of the employees in the case, In re Grand Jury Subpoena: Under Seal, 415 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 2005), who were confused about confidentiality because the company's counsel told them, "We can represent you as long as no conflict appears. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:23 am
Instead of battling commissioners tit-for-tat with lawsuits and fast-and-loose handling of grand jury testimony, Watkins, who again declined last week to discuss the matter, has real work to do now. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 8:36 am
The suspect has lived in Upshur County since about 2001, the prosecutor said.The district attorney said investigation of the case will continue, and that he didn't know when he would present it to the county's grand jury. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:56 pm
Div. 1997) (quoting In re Presentment of Bergen Cnty Grand Jury, 193 N.J. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 1:42 am
Lunt proceeded by obtaining grand jury indictments against ten men, including two lawyers, Robert Morris and George Davis. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:19 am
Google takes jury nullification to a whole new level. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 12:35 am
Stop, please.Fourth, media hype surrounding Bonds shows race still matters. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:02 pm
Likewise, the legal requirements of grand jury secrecy likely prohibit the department making public a great deal of the information that Americans might crave about the ongoing investigation. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
In re: Jeffrey Beard, et.al. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 11:06 am
And as a matter of principle, I don’t think that the courts should go very far in forcing their opinion of what’s proper on the people they’re supposed to be serving. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Indeed, I think that there are only three basic areas in which this has occurred regularly since Crawford – and even in those it was only relatively recent doctrinal changes, or in some cases an essential abandonment of doctrine, that prevented hearsay law from excluding the statements:First, before Crawford some courts had been admitting third-party confessions and statements made in formal, judicially supervised settings, such as grand jury testimony and allocution… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Indeed, I think that there are only three basic areas in which this has occurred regularly since Crawford – and even in those it was only relatively recent doctrinal changes, or in some cases an essential abandonment of doctrine, that prevented hearsay law from excluding the statements:First, before Crawford some courts had been admitting third-party confessions and statements made in formal, judicially supervised settings, such as grand jury testimony and allocution… [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 2:21 am
That led to serving as Special Counsel for the January 6 Congressional investigation, followed by the Office of Special Counsel DOJ investigation, and now we’re back to the Fulton County matter again with the grand jury indictment. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 9:34 pm
C’mon, admit it; you’re intrigued.) [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
To our knowledge, the Court has re-listed just the following case from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of April 16: Ransom v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 2008): Limits patentable subject matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:39 am
” Also, check out the actual 100+ page indictment from the federal grand jury we provided. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 1:13 pm
When you’re a plaintiff, you want to have a jury, a jury of your peers judging whether the decision to deny the claim was right or wrong, rather than a federal judge appointed for life. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
Given theimportance that expert testimony can assume, the jury should be aware ofdocuments and tangible things provided to the expert that might have influencedthe expert's opinion. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8) propriety of police… [read post]
