Search for: "Graves v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm
(People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427 [1986]; Gordon v People, 33 NY 501 [1865]; Graves v United States, 150 US 118, 121 [1893]).Importantly, this rule applies even where a party is not required to produce any evidence or that type of evidence. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 11:43 am
United States, No. 19-CF-235. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
Captioned Nasser Al-Alauqi v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 10:58 am
In Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm
But that speech can also inflict grave harm upon the public. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:00 am
The NSA conducts this surveillance by tapping into the internet backbone inside the United States — the physical infrastructure that carries our domestic and international online communications. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:42 pm
Sys. of Mo. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:59 pm
From the intro: Leading off this week are two stays from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:33 pm
He has been awarded the Vespasian V. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
Y.B. 50 (2021) 119-145 , introduction below.Pix Credit here Sascha-Dominik Dov BachmannCanberra Law School (Australia)ORCID: 0000-0002-8742-0766e-mail: Sascha.Bachmann@canberra.edu.auAnthony PaphitiFormer officer with the UK Army Legal Services (United Kingdom) Mass Migration as a Hybrid Threat? [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:38 pm
For instance, in the new Seventh Circuit case, United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:45 pm
“The United States,” Acting Solicitor General Gregory G. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
United States and two related cert petitions the justices will consider at Monday’s “long conference,” the first after their summer recess, that “present what is unquestionably the most important civil-military relations question that [the court has] confronted in decades. [read post]
8 May 2019, 12:30 pm
United States, winning a decision from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights holding that the United States violated international human rights law for failing to respond adequately to gender-based violence. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 6:04 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in this case is likely to cause delays inconsistent with the convention’s focus on prompt resolution of return petitions, thus affecting the United States’ performance of its treaty obligations. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
See, e.g., Halstead v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 738 F.3d 885, 892 (8th Cir. 2013) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
