Search for: "HAMILTON v. THE STATE" Results 581 - 600 of 2,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Eady J has twice held that the defence of fair comment cannot apply where the defamatory sting is a matter of verifiable fact –Hamilton v Clifford [2004] EWHC 1542 (QB) and British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2009] EWHC 1101 (subsequently reversed by the Court of Appeal). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
Some quotes:The Indiana Court of Appeals listened to arguments Tuesday in the case of Burke v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm by Will Baude
Article III simply declines to abrogate certain State immunities from suit, see Hans v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am by Amy Howe
”    Briefly: At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Angela Morrison weighs in on the Court’s recent decision in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 10:18 am
MAY, J., and MATHIAS, J., concur.In Kyle Hamilton v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:01 pm by Anna Christensen
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
  At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Michael Kagan weighs in on the Court’s decision in the immigration case Scialabba v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 4:58 pm
We disagree and affirm the judgment of the district court. 08a0320p.06 2008/08/26 James Stewart Hamilton v. [read post]