Search for: "HARRIS v. SMITH" Results 581 - 600 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Lynn, MA; Peter Smith, President) Bain Cor, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
D2008-0647 andGrupo Costamex, SA de C.V. v Stephen Smith and Oneandone Private Registration / 1&1 Internet Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 1:58 am
The Court reviewed the instructions in the instant case and stated the instruction was from the Wyoming Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions and had been used in Harries v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:58 pm
Smith Industries Ltd. et al., 2009 BCSC 275 at ¶33: There are a number of factors that courts must take into account when assessing this type of claim. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
Both sides in the NJ voting-machines lawsuit, Gusciora v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:04 am
On May 20, 2009, the CCA granted review in the the following three cases:PD-1805-08, Joseph Denver Smith v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:03 am
The CCA granted the Smith's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this indecent exposure case out of Harris County on the following issues:The First Court of Appeals erred by finding that the Information alleged with reasonable certainty, the acts relied upon to constitute recklessness.Joseph Smith was charged with indecent exposure for "recklessly" masturbating in front of an undercover officer at Houston's Memorial Park. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:25 am
Other participating firms in addition to Dechert (Joe Hetrick's the conference co-chair): Reed Smith, Arnold & Porter, King & Spalding, and Pepper Hamilton for our side and Cohen, Placitella, Raynes McCarty, and Seeger Weiss representing the other side of the "v".For a complete list of the pairings and the topics see the conference brochure. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:22 am
Stanford student John Dalton discusses last week’s oral argument in No. 08-5274, Dean v. [read post]