Search for: "HATCH v. STATE"
Results 581 - 600
of 776
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
Box 16520 Salt Lake City, UT 84116 Phone: (877) 543-7669 (Toll Free) Web: http://www.utahchip.org Hearing Impairments Programs for Individuals who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Utah Community Center of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Utah State Office of Rehabilitation 5709 South 1500 West Salt Lake City, UT 84123 Phone: (801) 263-4860 (V/TTY); (800) 860-4860 (V/TTY/Toll Free in UT only) Web: http://www.usor.state.ut.us/dsdhh/dsdhh.html State Agency for Individuals… [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 4:31 am
The State relied heavily on Lakewood v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am
United States, 14-10443, and Lopez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:07 pm
That decision was challenged in court, see Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:53 am
You can separately subscribe to the Pharma & Biotech edition of the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review by subscribing by email, or selecting ‘all posts’ or ‘Pharma, Biotech & Chem’ for the RSS option at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Oxytrol (Oxybutynin) - US: Watson files patent infringement lawsuit against Barr over application to market generic Oxytrol; Barr challenges Oxytrol patent… [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:00 pm
Just before I joined the agency, for example, the Supreme Court handed down its earth-shattering decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 8:27 am
In Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 10:24 am
’s (“Sun”) Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing en banc of an April 14, 2010 Federal Circuit decision in Novo Nordisk A/S v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 4:27 pm
Orrin Hatch examined the growth of PODs, primarily in the orthopedic implant (spine and total joint) sector of the device industry. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:56 pm
’” City of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
The Socially Aware blog had a post on regulatory developments affecting social media use in the United States. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:38 pm
Mensing, which held that state failure-to-warn claims against generic drug manufacturers were preempted by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, particularly the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Amendments. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Five years later, in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Under the auspices of the Operation Lone Star border initiative, Abbott put in place what amounts to a parallel system of immigration enforcement predicated on criminal arrests for misdemeanor trespass–exactly what Coe said that he and Smith had hatched as a plan in Kinney County. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection An amended complaint in the anti-trust claim filed against Google, brought by Texas and 14 other US states and Puerto Rico, describes the “Jedi” and “Jedi Blue” projects hatched by Google and Google and Facebook, respectively. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
Respected conservative former federal appeals court judge Michael Luttig had also made that point to Mike Pence just before January 6, 2021.(4) The factual predicate for the plot that Eastman (and Chesebro) hatched was that state and federal courts had ordered or allowed departures from the letter of state election law--and that these allowances deprived state legislatures of their constitutiona [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
