Search for: "Hague v. United States"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
Third, she argued she should not have to reimburse Pinto for enforcing the Mexican custody order since she claimed her Mexican lawyer said she could take the children to the United States without violating that order. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
In Sanchez v Sanchez, 2012 WL 3204183 (W.D.Tex.) [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:29 am
In Abou-Haidar, v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Facts: This case, (Berenice Vega Ostos v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 4:25 am
United Kingdom and Al-Skeini v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 1:42 am
Lord Mance stressed that the so-called Miller decisions of the Supreme Court in R (Miller) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 5 and R (Miller) v The Prime Minister, Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland (Miller II) [2019] UKSC 41, dealing with the parliamentary procedure of the withdrawal from the EU, are extraordinary regarding the degree of judicial activism from a British point of view. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 8:41 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 11:18 am
For these reasons, the Court concluded that the Luedtkes abandoned any residence they had in the United States and, at the time Heidi brought the children to the United States, their habitual residence was Switzerland. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 3:00 am
The government asserted that Rubio was likely residing outside of the United States. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:15 am
In Khalip v Khalip, 2011 WL 1882514 (E.D.Mich.) [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:04 am
Ferencz, 91, who had served as Chief Prosecutor for the United States in the Einsatzgruppen Case, tried before the post-World War II Nuremberg Military Tribunals (below right). [read post]
Ischiu v Garcia, 2017 WL 3500403 (D. Maryland, 2017)[Guatemala][Grave Risk of Harm][Petition denied]
15 Sep 2017, 9:21 am
Gomez Garcia requested asylum and was paroled into the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Let’s assume that the foreign defendant has no attorney or other agent in the United States to whom constitutionally adequate notice could be given. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:16 am
Edoho v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am
In a state v. state case, a state can assert the interests of its nationals. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 11:51 am
Below is the table of contents: Construction and Application of United States Supreme Court Holding in District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:12 pm
Seferin Ceraj and his wife, Irini Deda-Ceraj, both natives and citizens of Albania, entered the United States using fraudulent documents in March of 1997. [read post]
