Search for: "Harmon v. Harmon"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
Section 2, continued Eric Goldman: Libertarian view. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 2:01 am
Harmon, Jr., and Jeanne Harmon We'll post the BIO when it is available. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 12:58 pm
Justice Alito with opinion in Husted v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:31 am
Previously, in the much criticized case C-539/03 – Roche Nederland v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:01 am
Bryant v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:41 pm
In Youngblood v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
I get that if the Harmonized System Committee changes the law, Customs will implement the change. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:56 am
The Explanatory Notes the Harmonized System, which are not binding on U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am
The Container Store v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:11 am
Regarding proposed Reg BI, SIFMA recommended that the definition of “retail customer” be harmonized with FINRA’s definition because the definition as proposed would result in inconsistent and redundant compliance structures.SIFMA also urged the SEC to incorporate the “reasonable investor” definition of materiality set forth in Basic v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:38 pm
In Jedwards International, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
As a general rule, a party does not have a right to appeal a court's interlocutory order or an interlocutory decision. *** See Matter of Carver v State of New York, 26 NY3d 272The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2019/2019_03870.htm [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 7:06 pm
Workplace Policies Both the program and policy should harmonize with the organization’s various workplace policies, including: Employee Personal Information and Privacy Electronic Use, Communications & Systems Social Media (which should include ownership of content provisions) Hours of Work and Overtime Harassment, Discrimination and Human Rights policies All of these issues are now set against the backdrop of an employee’s residual expectation of privacy, a… [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 10:59 am
But I am aware of only one case that suggests that TRIPS might be relevant for interpreting U.S. substantive law: in Rotec Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:53 am
United States, the Court of International Trade held that under the Harmonized System, pliers are versatile two-handled tools with jaws that pivot to squeeze an object. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 7:43 am
There are actually rules in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule that would lead you to that conclusion. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 5:32 pm
Our next case to discuss in The Gerson Company v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 1:22 pm
Like the court in GRK, Customs and Border Protection looked back to an old case call United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:57 am
The National Intellectual Property Office, Hungary("the Office") communicated to Incyte the grant of the SPC on 7 October 2014, with a notice that an appeal to the administrative decision could be filed to the Fővárosi Törvényszék (Budapest High Court, Hungary) within 30 days of the communication of the decision. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
The policy shift harmonizes the U.S. patent system with the rest of the world, but creates potential problems for small firms or inventors who do not have the resources to win a race to the patent office against large corporate competitors. [read post]
