Search for: "Head v. United States" Results 581 - 600 of 6,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
McConnell concludes: The Supreme Court observed in Buckley v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am by Anita Davies
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:21 pm by Unknown
(Arm of the Tribe; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) State of Alaska v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 1:17 pm by Larry
United States involves the tariff classification of inexpensive open top glass vessles imported from China. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 1:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  With partisan division in Congress barring passage of any measure to react to the Supreme Court’s 2010 campaign finance decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by Serena Mayeri
The Loving decision came at a pivotal moment in the history of race, gender, law, and marriage in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 12:01 pm by Robert Black
“The United States Supreme Court recognized this in 1982 when it stated the issue was moot because the deadline for the ERA ratification expired before the requisite number of states approved it,” he stated. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
A familiar sight for lawyersinvolved in TVCatchup suitsITV Broadcasting Limited, ITV 2 Limited, ITV Digital Channels Limited, Channel Four Television Corporation, 4 Ventures Limited, Channel 5 Broadcasting Limited and ITV Studios Limited v TVCatchup Limited (in administration), TVCatchup (UK) Limited and Media Resources Limited (a Mauritian company) [2015] EWCA Civ 204 is the latest development in the long-running copyright litigation saga which is usually known by its shorter name of ITV… [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Reviewed by Catherine Cotter Head Law Librarian Gerard V La Forest Law Library, University of New Brunswick In CLLR 43:2 One Law for All? [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Contributory negligence was also adopted in the United States to protect big business interests from worker claims in the days before workers’ compensation existed. [read post]