Search for: "Hilton v. Hilton" Results 581 - 600 of 717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
She is also (says Dave) suing two other Labour Party members, Alex Hilton and John Gray, over related issues. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 9:43 am
" Hilton registered the trade mark "that's hot" with the USTPO.The 9th Circuit dismissed the trade mark infringement claim, which Hilton did not appeal, but accepted that Hilton could still argue that the card misappropriated her likeness in the image. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 3:03 am
Nealon issued an opinion in the case of Crossman v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 2:02 pm
(Paris) Hilton case, which fit nicely into this week's discussions of uncertain expectation... [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:35 pm
If you've not been following it (and why would you be), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision last week in Paris Hilton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission:… [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:34 am
Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit weighed in (Hilton v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 7:58 am by Woodrow Pollack
The Ninth Circuit dismissed this portion of the appeal because it determined it did not have jurisdiction to hear it.The Court rejected Hallmark's argument that the greeting card was, as a matter of law, protected free speech and sent the matter back to the trial court to proceed through litigation.Paris Hilton v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 11:18 am
It's tough to figure out who to root for when Paris Hilton sues Hallmark Cards.Does Paris Hilton get money for Hallmark putting her face and catchphrase ("It's hot") on a birthday card mimicking "The Simple Life"? [read post]