Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 581 - 600
of 63,734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 9:28 pm
Both the holding--that police act constitutionally when they make certain mistakes of law--and the lopsided outcome in Heien call to mind Davis v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:04 am
Here is the opinion in Loya v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 11:00 am
California’s highest court held yesterday in Pitzer College v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
The post State v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:11 am
Justices Souter and Ginsburg dissented, insisting that the statute is unconstitutional under the Court's precedents, New York v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
In State of Nevada v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 2:30 am
United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
The Court appears to be holding United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 12:51 pm
Section 230 only affects state laws that try to hold a blogger liable for content posted by someone else. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 1:23 pm
Last week I noted the appeal in Jones v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton (75 ALA. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:51 pm
In Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:06 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 4:22 am
The Court's holding in Apprendi led to its holding that the United States Sentencing Guidelines were advisory, rather than mandatory, five years later, in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:40 am
Nebraska Supreme court holds state trooper can be discharged based upon his off duty association with the KKKSource: Adjunct Law Prof Blog; [lawprofessors.typepad.com]Reproduced with permission. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Last week, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Moore v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:06 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 10:42 am
Div., A-3476-10T2, December 30, 2011: Our State’s strong public policy favors arbitration, an alternative means of dispute resolution, EPIX Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
Stating the holding of the Patchak plurality (6-3) most succinctly, and perhaps foreshadowing Oil States, Justice Ginsburg explained: “What Congress grants, it may retract. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 1:11 pm
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. [read post]
