Search for: "Holm v. Holm" Results 581 - 600 of 1,852
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2010, 8:22 pm by cdw
The Seventh Circuit in Eric Holmes v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:03 pm by Mark Tushnet
(I think he made that observation in connection with some arguments around Cohen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"That one gets less attention because the damage to transparency wasn't done last session but two decades ago in an episode which most folks - cops and reformers alike - have long forgotten, even if it comes up again and again in police accountability contexts.In 1996, a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:12 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Masland, 244 U.S. 100 (1917), when Justice Holmes addressed the exact same question as that presented in In re M-I. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 7:15 am by Daniel Schwartz
The New Jersey Employment Law Blog has this good post describing the key aspect: Recently, in Holmes v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Professor Grow tells us that the book “provides the first comprehensive history of the 1922 Supreme Court case of Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 12:28 pm by Mark Tushnet
[There would be an interpretive question about Bolling v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 6:35 am by Gritsforbreakfast
While the AG upheld Houston's request to keep the policy secret (an example of the transparency losses suffered when the Legislature codified Holmes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:01 am by Siobhan Hayes
This post was written by Siobhan Hayes, Catherine Johnson and Angela Gregson, with contributions from Marjorie Holmes and Edward Miller In the first case subjecting a permitted user clause in a lease to scrutiny under the Competition Act, a landlord local authority seeking to impose use restrictions on its tenant (to promote mixed use in a parade of shops) lost its case on the grounds that it would breach competition law by doing so and that it had not proven that the requirements for… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Lee Wilson leads the new “legal history emphasis area” in the Department of History and Geography’s at Clemson University (Clemson News).Here is the historians' amicus brief in the free speech case, Moody v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:28 am by Andrew Koppelman
  They clearly are a source of law, as the plaintiffs found in Singer v. [read post]
23 Mar 2013, 2:12 am by Jasmine Joseph
When granted, it is the determination of the ultimate authority that the publicwelfare will be better served by inflicting less than what the judgment fixed (Biddle v. [read post]