Search for: "Holm v. Holm" Results 581 - 600 of 1,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 7:36 am by chief
Unsurprisingly there is plenty of reference to Holmes-Moorehouse (our note), and also to Mohamed v Hammersmith & Fulham [2001] UKHL 57. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:31 pm
TITLE: Three Generations, No Imbeciles SUBTITLE: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 12:54 am
S-07-529, Mary Kay Davis (Appellant) v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:27 am by Ellena Erskine
The justices will then hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
“The reasonable person”, wrote Justices Claire L’Heureux-Dubé and Beverley McLachlin in R. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by Ben
It's not unexpected - the District Court's ruling that all but ten of Coinan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories were in the public domain would prevent the Estate from licensing all but those ten works - as well as potentially profitable spin offs, and new stories based on the characters of Holmes and Dr Watson. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 7:12 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Masland, 244 U.S. 100 (1917), when Justice Holmes addressed the exact same question as that presented in In re M-I. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 5:19 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"That one gets less attention because the damage to transparency wasn't done last session but two decades ago in an episode which most folks - cops and reformers alike - have long forgotten, even if it comes up again and again in police accountability contexts.In 1996, a case styled Holmes v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 2:03 pm by Mark Tushnet
(I think he made that observation in connection with some arguments around Cohen v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 11:00 am by Dan Ernst
  Professor Grow tells us that the book “provides the first comprehensive history of the 1922 Supreme Court case of Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. [read post]