Search for: "Howe v. People"
Results 581 - 600
of 35,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:54 pm
How about this testimony: "I've been involved in law enforcement for many years. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:47 am
So, as applied here, it's a largely academic debate, albeit an important one whose conclusion may substantially affect other cases.Parenthetically, how embarrassed must the trial court -- Judge Peter Deddeh (down here in San Diego) -- be about forgetting the reasonable doubt instruction. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:36 am
That's not how California works. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:58 pm
I can't even fathom how I'd function -- at all -- under such a "medicinal" regiment. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:33 pm
Runyeon post – Behold, @ManhattanDA‘s chart to help jurors understand the 34 felony counts against Donald Trump & how they link up to the evidence. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:49 pm
People v. my client- It is not every day a DWI criminal complaint gets dismissed based upon facial insufficiency grounds. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 12:14 am
As Diane Karpman explains, "In Khani v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:40 am
It dodges, in a very nice way, the question of how much of a [...] [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:21 am
That was the fate of Degelmann et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:26 am
I did not know much about the United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Great demonstration of initiative.I also liked how the Court of Appeal ended its opinion: by remanding the case and ordering the completion of the Prop. 47 hearing within 45 days. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
The general manager testified that it struck him “[h]ow calmly and slowly the person . . . came in the building and how familiar it appeared to be to them,” as they “kn[ew] exactly where to go to commit the armed robbery, where the money would be and on what floor. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 3:51 pm
Reasonable minds might well disagree as to both (1) how much of a concern suffices to create an exception to the warrant requirement, as well as (2) whether that standard, whatever it is, was satisfied here.But at least for me, I think that the circumstances here were sufficiently unusual -- and in a way that I could easily imagine would result in a person in distress being in the home -- to create at least a non-trivial (i.e., real) risk that the officers would enter the home… [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
It's interesting how all the various rights line up here. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:04 pm
No downside if you get it wrong.Just remember how to count. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
The guy can't be tried again for the same offense.You see why the Court of Appeal comes out that way.That said, I wonder how those principles really apply to prosecutions that, as here, involve "status" charges. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
Defendant estimated he was driving 45 miles per hour at this point, but Emery testified that she was going 70 miles per hour.Though defendant could not see beyond the truck, did not know whether there were more cars in front of it, and could not tell how much space there was between Emery and the truck, he decided to pull into the westbound lane and pass both vehicles. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 1:05 pm
’ My question is, and it’s not going to happen, but if the District Attorney or somebody said, ‘I need you to come and tell your story to court,’ how would you feel? [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:03 am
In the case of Mason v. [read post]
