Search for: "Hudson v. US Government"
Results 581 - 600
of 609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2007, 5:13 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
, overbreadth, failure to knock and announce (foreclosed by Hudson), none of which prevailed. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:40 am
Pakhomious Coptic Orthodox Church an application for a real property tax exemption 599
A7936
Jaffee -- Authorizes Congregation Ribnitz, Inc. to retroactively apply for a property tax exemption 598
A7905
Lopez V (MS) -- Relates to the shelter allowance for individuals and families receiving public assistance and residing in city, state, or federal public housing 597
A7892
Brook-Krasny (MS) -- Relates to shareholder votes in mutual… [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:12 pm
Locke v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:41 am
Hudson, 2007 U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
JA 201. 07a0244p.06 2007/06/26 Parker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 7:10 am
Supreme Court's controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v New London (545 US 469) greatly expanded the government's power of eminent domain by holding that the government could transfer land from one private owner to another to further economic development. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Detroit Board of Education and Teachers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 5:12 am
In ALI SALEH KAHLAH AL-MARRI v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 3:28 pm
The Fifth Circuit sided with the county and held that Central Hudson does not require that evidence used to satisfy its strictures exist pre-enactment.Some will find this second aspect problematic. [read post]
6 May 2007, 5:17 am
In Harris v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 4:13 am
A California Indian tribe running a casino used tribal police for security. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 9:47 pm
" State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:56 am
Hudson Savings Bank v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
See Hudson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
Perhaps unsurprisingly, courts are mostly willing to examine direct government regulations for First Amendment violations.Recent cases: Piazza's Seafood World v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
Hall v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 3:15 pm
. -- (1) suppressed the results of a search because the officers didn't give the occupant a copy of the warrant, and (2) entered a post-trial judgment of acquittal on Count Two, which charged the defendant with possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug crime, holding that the government had merely demonstrated possession of the weapon, not use in furtherance.Judge McKeown, in a very well-written opinion, reverses on both issues. [read post]
