Search for: "Human v. State" Results 581 - 600 of 19,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 11:46 am by Kate Fort
While the structure and ideology of international human rights law is such that the interests of tribes (and tribal members) are almost always subordinated to the interests of aspirant members and the public, CANZUS states (the affluent western settler states of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United States) have been able to augment domestic human rights law in order to provide normative space for tribal self-constitution. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Consider, for the moment, the case of State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:35 am by Melina Padron
RK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 456 (20 April 2011)  Court of appeal sends Zimbabwean asylum case back to tribunal as need more evidence as to whether they would have to lie about political beliefs. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am by Graeme Hall
In the courts: BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011): Sec of State irrational in ignoring fresh evidence in Malawi asylum claim. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am by Graeme Hall
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 (08 June 2011): No error of law deporting Bangladeshi man convicted of complicity in shooting. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
His at times toughly-worded lecture to the UCL Judicial Institute and the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law chimes with what the Attorney General Dominic Grieve has been saying recently about the need for primary responsibility for human rights protection to lie with states, not Strasbourg – and Grieve will surely approve of both the content and timing of Lord Irvine’s intervention, on the eve of the European Court’s ruling in Al-Khawaja and Tahery… [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Whilst the law may have changed in spite of the Human Rights Act, it is notable that in the United States, where there is no constitutionally enshrined right to privacy, private phone hacking is not as strictly regulated. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:03 pm by nflatow
Shell Petroleum, this time on the question of whether the 200-year-old Alien Tort Statute applies to human rights violations that occur outside the United States. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:33 am
Here's the abstract:In the case concerning Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]