Search for: "Husband (S) v. Wife (S)" Results 581 - 600 of 6,204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 11:40 am
Since the New Jersey divorce, the ex-wife's income had increased, but the judge only focused on the fact that the ex-husband's income had stayed about the same since the divorce, and it did not refer to Stamberg v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
Having determined that the husband established irretrievable breakdown pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170(7), Supreme Court was under no obligation to grant the wife a judgment of divorce on the ground of adultery or constructive abandonment (see Hoffer–Adou v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
Having determined that the husband established irretrievable breakdown pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 170(7), Supreme Court was under no obligation to grant the wife a judgment of divorce on the ground of adultery or constructive abandonment (see Hoffer–Adou v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 4:35 pm
Now neither a husband nor a wife is liable for the other's expenses for necessities in Florida. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:32 pm
  In question was aspirational language contained in the order suggesting a hope that the Former Husbands timesharing would return to routine and normal timesharing, and the Former Wifes alleged failure to negotiate with the Former Husband to achieve that state. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s the order that a Wisconsin court issued in telling an ex-wife that she may not speak online about her ex-husband (emphasis in original). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Husband's obligation to pay maintenance shall terminate before the five years in the event of the Wife's remarriage, her death or the Husband's death. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 7:26 am by admin
  Husbands expert witness was not able to meet with the business owner wife, and relied on husbands financial records and a website for the company that did not reveal much. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm by Daniel Clement
Although the Court found that the wife would have killed the husband, but for his daughter’s intervention, the Court in the case S.K. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 5:21 pm by Gregory Forman
That appears to be what happened to Wife in the November 2, 2016 Court of Appeals opinion in Miteva v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 2:28 pm
Disqualification was warranted due to the judge's past employment of and past attorney/client relationship with the husband's second wife. [read post]
11 May 2014, 12:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Also, based on the cases of Bengard v Bengard, Krigsman v Krigsman and Saasto v Saasto, the court finds that the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by deducting the sum of $39,732 for the wife's counsel fees from the husband's distributive award of 40% of the equity in the marital residence because the husband's obstructionist tactics unnecessarily prolonged the litigation. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:15 pm by Rich Vetstein
Court Shoots Down Lender’s Attempt to Expand Doctrine of Equitable Subrogation In the interesting case of Wells Fargo Bank v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
A wife complaints to the Qadi about her husband's impotence Artist: Hamse-i Atai (18th century Ottoman miniature) Source Wikipedia Mr Justice Birss: Actavis and Others v Eli Lilly and Another [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat) (10 Aug 2016)  Although it is not spelt out anywhere in the 492 paragraphs and annexes to Mr Justice Birss's judgment, this complicated [read post]