Search for: "IN RE: ARNOLD" Results 581 - 600 of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2008, 5:13 pm
Arnold Schwarzenegger in a letter on Thursday to fund all of the remaining 100 judges in the budget year that starts July 1. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 8:17 am by Alfred Brophy
 In addition to the re-appointment of Ms. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
Goodstein, a partner at Dewey & LeBoeuf, write that despite the uncertainties imposed by the rulings in In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC and In re Pacific Lumber Co., which held that the Bankruptcy Code does not require credit bidding any time a sale of assets occurs under a plan, each provides guidance as to how to avoid the risk meant to be protected by credit bidding - forced sale of collateral for less than its full value. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 1:42 am by Mike
  She wants a nice guy but if you’re nice she doesn’t want you – that’s a Catch-22. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
"They're not raising because they value us. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by adio
  Suppose you’re stuck in bumper to bumper traffic. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 12:20 pm by Asaph Abrams
No pun intended, yet I now picture the punning Arnold Schwarzenegger as Dr. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 12:01 pm
"One could argue that this country is on the verge of a crisis of legitimacy," the economic blogger Arnold Kling writes. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 3:54 am
Arnold, Judge Representing Appellant (Defendant): Diane M. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Relentless.Justice Hull lets you know at the very outset that we're not just talking about any defendant. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am by Arnie Clarke
After visiting Cranfield University in July 1982, Prof Shanks became interested in the possibility of using re-usable or disposable devices incorporating biosensors for diagnostic applications. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
"Genuine use"Arnold J helpfully summarised the principles on "genuine use" at in London Taxi [Although that case was the subject of an appeal, the Court of Appeal agreed with Arnold on this point without any comment on his reasoning or analysis] :1. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Mr Justice Arnold reviewed the principles: accessibility from the UK is not enough; the test is objective but actual evidence of UK targeting may be relevant; all the circumstances must be evaluated; is it possible to buy goods from it and have them shipped to the UK; is GBP used as a currency; is there a UK telephone number; how many UK consumers visit the website; and so on.Assessing the evidence, Arnold J concluded that there was no targeting of the UK by Easyfly. 98% of its… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:30 am by Josh H. Escovedo
” Counsel for the Redskins, Quinn Emanuel and Arnold & Porter, argue that this notion is disturbing. [read post]