Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF R. P., A CHILD"
Results 581 - 600
of 837
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 4:08 pm
In a May 23 ruling, Honorable Paul P. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:47 pm
Yuba Power Products, Inc., 377 P.2d 897 (1963), qtd. in Congressional Research Service, Products Liability: A Legal Overview, CRS Issue Brief, Jun. 3, 2005). [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am
In her judgment, Laffoy J. made extensive reference to the English court decisions in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC and Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm
G. v Anthony P. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:42 am
Third, the representative plaintiffs would receive $1,000 "per affected child for each Plaintiff. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
Family Court denied the mother's objection to the order dated February 8, 2010, rejecting her contention that the subject child was emancipated and, not entitled to child support. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
It stated that the best interests of the child are determined by a review of the totality of the circumstances. [read post]
20 May 2011, 1:33 pm
A lot of the child pornography involved prepubescent children, and generally involved “[p]repubescent and pubescent boys and girls mainly between the ages of ten and seventeen were shown engaged in sexually explicit activities with each other and with adult males. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:00 am
" These are interesting statistics. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:31 pm
We do not represent government, corporations or large business interests. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:16 pm
“Conventional wisdom says college is an essential investment in your child’s future. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
The relevant-irrelevant (R-I) technique ii. [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am
Accordingly, his obligation for child support arrears continued to accrue, and there is no basis in law to adjust or reduce his obligation to pay child support arrears. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:43 pm
Van Camp v Van Camp (1921) 53 CA 17, 199 P 885; Pereira v Pereira (1909) 156 C 1, 103 P 488. 8. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
But Adida’s more interesting point is the one about the selective morality at play in debates over information control. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
The Document Request directed the Debtor to provide to the Auditor, by February 14, 2007, copies of (i) payment advices or other evidence of payment from an employer for the six months preceding the Petition Date; (ii) federal income tax returns for the two most recent taxable periods; (iii) account statements for all depository and investment accounts in which the Debtor has an interest for the six months preceding the Petition Date; and (iv) if the debtor is divorced, the divorce decree,… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:27 am
Rivero, 216 P.3d 213 (Rivero II) added a new requirement to the previous Nevada ‘changed circumstances’ standard. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
We are now going to do X (such as, seek guardianship over your child in order to provide treatment you are refusing). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
CiteID=461989Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, Honorable Dan R. [read post]
