Search for: "In Re Adoption of Steven S."
Results 581 - 600
of 763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 9:18 am
Indeed, although I haven’t re-read her dissent closely, it’s my sense that the Abbott Majority adopts both her method of analysis and her specific findings on this question nearly in toto, whether in looking at the treaty’s text, its object and purpose, the negotiating history, and other foreign law decisions. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
(Justice Samuel Alito reportedly has adopted the Stevens approach.) [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:29 am
Concord’s position was slightly more nuanced, at least in tone: We’re worth more to you than you are to us. [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:01 am
Congress responded by adopting a Joint Resolution authorizing the President to ? [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:47 pm
On then to my own evaluation of the First Amendment articles: I think they’re excellent. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:01 am
It's written by Brett Barrouquere. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
They're also not interested in growth at all costs. [read post]
9 May 2010, 12:17 pm
” Justice Stevens authored Citizens’s principal dissent. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Each separate section below is identified by its author(s). [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
While much of this ground is familiar to criminal procedure scholars, it is worth re-examining in light of Justice Stevens’ imminent departure from the Court. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:50 pm
STEVENS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which GINSBURG and SOTOMAYOR, JJ., joined. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
” Justice Stevens has not expressed strong opinions. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
Only it’s not. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:27 pm
(It's true enough that Justice Scalia doesn't concede that there were in fact "hundreds of judges" who read Miller as adopting the militia-use understanding, so maybe the Court would have an out to not resurrect Miller if they ever adopted this theory.) [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Criminal Law The most significant area of the law in which Judge Garland’s views obviously differ materially from those of Justice Stevens is criminal law. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Law professor Marc Edelman suggests that, “[i]f the court adopts the NFL’s single-entity concept, it would change everything. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:33 am
We all want to feel powerful, and by adopting the loves and hates of the government, our team wins almost every battle. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:01 am
This has the joint failing of conceding hypocrisy while adopting a straw argument. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
Suchterm shall not include—‘‘(i) children’s metal jewelry;‘‘(ii) painted children’s toys (as theterm ‘children’s toy’ is defined in section108(e)(1)(B));‘‘(iii) children’s products composedprimarily of accessible vinyl;‘‘(iv) any children’s product for whichthe donating party or the seller has actualknowledge that the product is in violationof the lead limits… [read post]
