Search for: "In Re Application of Smith" Results 581 - 600 of 2,115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
I quote below the body of the argument in the brief, minus the footnotes; but if you’re interested in the issue, you might just want to read the PDF. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 1571, 4 U.S.P.Q.2d 1141, 1143 (Fed. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
Judge Smith) issued a partial summary judgment order invalidating many of Block's claims in its '617 patent based on a violation of the "new matter" prohibition of the written description requirement – holding that Block's "February 2002 amendment added new matter to the pending application, which is prohibited by section 132. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 7:14 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:11 am by Susan I. Nelson
Smith of Siebman, Reynolds, Burg, Phillips & Smith, LLP to supply an amicus curiae brief on the application of Star Trek, or for that matter, any sci-fi show and its application to Texas law. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:00 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The committee will hear testimony from Eric Schmidt, the co-founder of Schmidt Futures; Brad Smith, the president of the Microsoft Corporation and Ret. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am by Alan Butler
A better way to resolve the issue in this case is to re-evaluate Smith in light of the changes in our communications systems since 1979. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 8:44 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The new statute took effect Sept. 1, and is an acknowledgment that criminal law – rigid and, importantly, wedded to finality – must evolve to keep pace with scientific advances.The principal dispute, Smith reported, surrounds whether biomechanical research regarding child trauma is new science or merely old science re-packaged:El Paso District Attorney Jaime Esparza does not agree that Avila's case falls under the new law. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 6:55 am by Bernard Bell
  Judge Cannon identified two reasons for refusing to apply the doctrine to Jack Smith’s actions. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith (1990), any such religious belief would likely be constitutionally irrelevant — the duty to testify would likely be viewed as a generally religion-neutral law of general applicability, and even sincere religious objectors would not be entitled to a constitutional exemption. [read post]