Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 581 - 600
of 14,245
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
The Justice Department has issued two opinions consistent with this understanding. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 5:48 am
It has been decades since the Supreme Court, under the leadership of Justice Scalia and Chief Justice Roberts started ignoring such floor colloquies, which are often staged for the benefit of the courts, in favor of the plain meaning of legislative text. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm
Kendall Ciesemier: Can you tell us what Students for Justice in Palestine or SJP is as a student organization? [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 11:22 pm
In a lengthy, thoughtful and (for Westlands) blistering opinion, a unanimous panel of appellate justices affirmed the trial court decision in August 2023. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
They cannot be a predicate for an opinion under Rule 703. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 8:26 am
In re Oliver (1948). [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
(See Justice Neil Gorsuch's opinions upholding a public-high-school football coach's right to hold group prayer on the fifty-yard line, and in favor of a wedding-Web-site designer who feared being forced to work for same-sex couples.) [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 11:16 am
" easy call) is that this man is not qualified to run, the Court should not say, "We're unwilling to decide. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 6:55 am
Putting the Death Penalty on Trial As public opinion on the death penalty continues to sour, in 2024 we’re putting the death penalty on trial in North Carolina. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 5:41 am
Seek medical attention even if you don’t think you’re injured. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
” This means we’re going to get a textualist interpretation, accurate or not, but also we’re going to get policy and “living” text arguments because…why not? [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
I wish folks would protest from home and virtually, but if they're going to protest we're [going to] be tough on enforcing the … no congregation. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:42 pm
United States (2012), re-read this passage from Justice Kennedy's majority opinion: However the law is interpreted, if §2(B) only requires state officers to conduct a status check during the course of an authorized, lawful detention or after a detainee has been released, the provision likely would survive pre-emption—at least absent some showing that it has other consequences that are adverse to federal law and its objectives. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:55 am
We recognize though that with the advent of online legal databases and the posting of nonpublished opinion we are certain the “adoption” of legal reasoning is common practice.And NLJ has 'The Glue of This Court': Justices, Clerks Receive O'Connor's Casket at Supreme Court -- The nation's first female justice lies in repose at the Great Hall of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:43 am
The Fifth Circuit found that its earlier ruling in In re Dean (5th Cir. 2008) provided a helpful analogy for resolving this case. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Rather than setting cases for re-argument, the Court 4-4'd cases including Friedrichs v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 9:00 am
Just as you’re about to fall, a safety net appears, saving you. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 8:44 am
If you’re new to FOSTA cases and you are baffled by the layers of inferences and arguments here, you are definitely not alone. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:54 am
If you’re facing criminal charges, seeking experienced legal counsel before trial is crucial to navigate the complexities of the justice system. [read post]