Search for: "In Re September 11 Litigation" Results 581 - 600 of 1,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: Belgium - eBay wins ruling against L’Oreal in dispute over liability for counterfeit goods sold in online auctions: (Managing Intellectual Property), (Counterfeit Chic), (IPKat), (Class 46), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica) US CAFC holds that copying free software without complying with license is copyright infringement: Robert Jacobsen v… [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
  The following language is from paragraph 11 of Dr. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A decision may be expected within weeks, not later than the end of the current term, unless re-argument is scheduled. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A decision may be expected within weeks, not later than the end of the current term, unless re-argument is scheduled. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:10 am by Wolfgang Demino
The Trust Agreement was based on an Interim Trust Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2007 by and between the Depositor and the Owner Trustee. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Zimmerman lost his re-election bid. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 8:10 am by Andrew Delaney
The entry order deals with whether a non-attorney guardian can act on behalf of a ward as a pro se litigant. [read post]
17 May 2008, 9:53 am
Suffice to say, we're looking forward to his continued commentaries.This week, Alvin revisits Chubb and Sagl, a September 2007 Ontario Superior Court decison in which an Oakville, Ontario antique collector was awarded $500,000 in punitive damages after her insurer, alleging arson, refused to pay a legitimate fire-damage claim.......Bridgette Sagl was obsessed with and unusually attached to her collections … furniture, paintings,… [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:09 pm
In re Celexa & Lexapro Products Liability Litigation, 2006 U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 10:25 pm
You're listening to Episode #127 on Tuesday, September 9th, 2008. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion filed September 6, and later ordered published on October 7, 2019, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying plaintiff groups’ writ petition challenging Sonoma County’s use permit and related mitigated negative declaration (MND) for a winery project in the County’s rural Knights Valley area. [read post]