Search for: "In re: Apple, Inc." Results 581 - 600 of 1,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2012, 12:52 pm by William A. Ruskin
Apple, Inc., (In Re Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation) which submission was filed in the SDNY on July 6, 2012. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 11:25 am
.” Since assuming the top Disney job from Michael Eisner 15 months ago, Iger has won praise for dropping Disney’s previous antagonism toward Web innovations and striking such pioneering deals as being the first one to sell prime-time television shows and movies over Apple Computer Inc.’s iTunes store. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:02 pm by Ross
So be sure to stop by and say hi if you’re able to come to any of these four programs. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
(Techdirt) US Copyright Office seeking comments on proposed exempted classes of works (Daily Dose of IP) Lawrence Lessig opinion article: Don’t make kids online crooks (ContentAgenda) BitTorrent as marketing tool, nominated for an interactive award (TorrentFreak) Copyright laws are working – tale of two creators (ContentAgenda) Developing decent digital distribution solutions – Part III (Ip's What's Up)   US Copyright - Decisions District Court C D… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
Nintendo (Maier & Maier)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps HTC - ITC to investigate Apple for infringement (Maier & Maier) (Ars Technica) Rambus - Rambus shares nosedive on court news (IP finance)   US Copyright US government told piracy losses are exaggerated (TorrentFreak) The Google Books ripple effect (IP Osgoode) Verizon: Comcast P2P blocking was wrong, we won't do it (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court S D New… [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:30 am
Inc. to pay $22 million for unjust enrichment after finding the retailer willfully stole TechForward Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:54 pm by Kelly
Election Systems & Software, Inc (Docket Report) District Court Maryland: Software providers do not infringe method claims requiring action by end users: Technology Patents LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by Dennis Crouch
  This is an important acknowledgement, as such commitments typically lack the necessary elements of a bilateral contractual arrangement, and have been questioned in both corporate acquisitions and bankruptcy proceedings (see In re Nortel Networks Inc., Order - Case No. 09-10138(KG) (Bankruptcy Ct. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 12:21 pm by lennyesq
We’re working on a fix. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am by Ross Davies
Apple, Inc. - Christy Susman, Letter to Patrick Wensink, Jack Daniel's, July 12, 2012 [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Apple joined the petition long after it would have been barred from filing its own. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 7:33 am by Ronald Mann
Apple) and December (Life Technologies Corp. v Promega Corp.) sessions, the justices heard cases that involved rules for multi-component products. [read post]