Search for: "In re: Watkins" Results 581 - 600 of 721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army - More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday) US Copyright - Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in 'Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea' and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (Seattle Trademark… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(EDTexweblog.com) US Army – More DOA patents (12:01 Tuesday)   US Copyright – Decisions Reporting on 6th Circuit decision in Bridgeport Music v UMG Recordings concerning copyright in ‘Bow wow wow, yippie yo, yippie yea’ and accompanying musical elements (The 1709 Copyright Blog) (Property, intangible) District Court W D Washington dismisses Freedom of Information Act suit for information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v US Bureau of Customs and Border… [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 8:17 pm by Robert Chesney
Ken Watkin, Overlap of IHL and IHRL: A North American Perspective, Part II, September 10th on Intercross Lawrence Hill-Cawthorne, Developing the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict: A view on the Harmonization Project, September 12th on EJIL:Talk! [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
. * * * Since we’re on this topic, let me mention a related claim that I’ve heard from some academics: that, at least in the 1960s to 1980s, “only Christians ever [won] free exercise cases” in the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 5:51 am by SHG
They handcuffed Watkins and took him outside to sit on the curb. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 11:38 am by Michael Lowe
We’re just now learning about the failure of the prosecutor in this death penalty murder case to provide the defense lawyer with a cooperation agreement with a trial witness. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:18 pm
(If Texas hasn't already executed an innocent person, at the rate we're going it's only a matter of time.) [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:30 am
We’re very pleased to be able to kick off Truth on the Market’s symposium on Section and the Section 2     Report. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm by Tony Mauro
Speaking at his Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, GOP senators challenged Verrilli (pictured at left) to say whether he agreed with the administration's decision, and whether, as the administration's top lawyer before the Court, he would re-examine it. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
West Coast standard bearers Latham & Watkins and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher announced that they're increasing first-year associate pay to $160,000 in New York, but only to $145,000 in California and elsewhere. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:31 am
Levin, The Activist Investor, on Wednesday, June 1, 2022 Tags: Boards of Directors, Institutional Investors, Proxy voting, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Universal proxy ballots The Modern State and the Rise of the Business Corporation Posted by Taisu Zhang and John Morley (Yale Law School), on Wednesday, June 1, 2022 Tags: Corporate forms, Corporate liability, Legal history, Legal… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:28 pm by David Lat
According to Am Law Daily, Howrey will be advised in its wind-down efforts by none other than Latham & Watkins. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 1:43 pm by David Lat
[FN1] Contrary to what some of you think, we’re actually huge fans of S&C here at Above the Law. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 3:16 am
Before that, he worked under former Deputy Director Mike McAlevey at General Electric and for former Director John Huber at Latham & Watkins - so he's had plenty of exposure to the Division. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:01 pm by Joseph Kim
 Whether you’re in real estate, personal injury, business law, or some other practice area, layoffs are possible. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 6:18 pm
A retort to Baer's letter by the bloggers--"We're not quite sure what Skadden's "values" are (or, for that matter, the Firm's "standards of behavior")"--is perhaps the most troubling aspect of this little imbroglio. [read post]