Search for: "In re 2012 Legislative Districting of the State" Results 581 - 600 of 833
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2012, 8:36 am by Andrew Ramonas
"I registered now because we have been asked to prepare a comprehensive legislative approach that would benefit all victims of Iranian terror, not just our clients, and I have just begun detailed discussions with folks on the Hill re[garding] that proposal," Newberger wrote in an e-mail. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:50 pm by Wells Bennett
   Legislators doubled down on that policy more recently, and in doing so, went so far as to state explicitly that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed must not be brought to the United States. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm by Joey Fishkin
  (The Times reports that “some Republicans, facing re-election in swing districts, are openly suggesting that some measures should remain. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am by Jeff Gamso
  Much as the most rabid of the TeaPartiers may bitch and moan about how bad things are, we're not close. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Steve Hall
Beverly Perdue's veto of legislation rolling back a state law giving North Carolina's death row prisoners a method to seek a reduced sentence because of racial bias. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
    In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
    In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 11-2664, decided June 28, 2012, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)[2], which dismissed the claim of Humana Insurance Company (“Humana”) and other similarly situated providers of MAOs against GlaxoSmithKline, LLC and GlaxoSmithKline plc (collectively, “GSK”) for reimbursement of… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm by David Kravets
Here is a summary of key decisions from the court’s 2011-2012 term: United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:10 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
” In re Nomination Papers of Ralph Nader, 580 Pa. 22, 44, 858 A.2d 1167, 1180 (Pa. 2004). [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:40 am by Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz
EPA is not required to re-prove the existence of the atom every time it approaches a scientific question. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:25 am by Russ Bensing
  If you’re thinking of throwing together an assignment on insufficiency, heed the cautionary advice of the 2nd District’s decision in State v. [read post]