Search for: "In re Applied Materials, Inc." Results 581 - 600 of 2,719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 12:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County’s “peer review” sound consultant (“Pack”) opined that Rosen’s chosen monitoring locations were “topographically shielded,” and that Rosen failed to consider numerous material acoustical factors. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:44 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  In re Jackson, 972 F.3d 25 (2d Cir. 2020). [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 11:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 However, suggestive marks can still be weak (when they’re descriptive). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
According to the City, the former version New York Tax Law § 471 applied a tax to cigarettes sold to reservation retailers for re-sale to the public, and the defendant agents violated that provision by distributing large quantities of cigarettes to reservation retailers without purchasing and affixing the requisite state tax stamps. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Pharmaceutical Patents: “Promise of the Patent” Doctrine re Utility AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 1:24 am by John L. Welch
In re Tropical Seas, Inc., Serial No. 77830997 (August 12, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 1:24 pm by John Stigi and Alejandro Moreno
  The Court began by quoting the seminal Delaware Court of Chancery decision in In re Caremark International Inc., 698 A.2 959 (Del. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is binding precedent that the rules of res judicata apply to the decisions of a bankruptcy court” (Winkler v Weiss, 294 AD2d 428, 429 [2d Dept 2002]). [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:14 am by Sean Wajert
In re Supreme Beef Processors, Inc., 468 F.3d 248, 253 (5th Cir. 2006). [read post]