Search for: "In re Stevens"
Results 581 - 600
of 5,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2021, 4:42 pm
Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications, University of Westminster This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am
Stevens, the majority opinion said: The demand for hunting depictions exceeds the estimated demand for crush videos or animal fighting depictions by several orders of magnitude. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 6:50 am
” Perhaps the most egregious example was a front-page Daily Mail headline on June 16 (inevitably repeated by the Sun) claiming that a truckload of migrants had arrived in the U.K. demanding, “We’re from Europe – let us in! [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:06 am
You're welcome, but I still think the arrogance and entitlement of Ted Stevens is both disgraceful in itself, and a blot on the honor of the Republicans. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 1:24 pm
New Jersey may be on the wrong track for now, but we’re showing it doesn’t have to stay that way. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:50 am
Humanitarian Law Project, the same majority, this time joined by Justice John Paul Stevens, ruled that the First Amendment permits Congress to imprison human rights activists for up to fifteen years merely for advising militant organizations on ways to reject violence and pursue their disputes through lawful means. [read post]
16 May 2010, 7:17 am
By Steven G. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:48 pm
The In re Servaas decision including all concurrences and dissents is here. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 1:29 pm
Of course, the president, who Bradbury said re-authorized the NSA program every 45 days for almost six years, would have to erect that hurdle himself. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 1:42 pm
By Steven G. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 9:44 am
Stevens — have you noticed? [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
Even if you're not persuaded by that reasoning. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:43 pm
Stevens had? [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
James Grimmelman has a gem on this post by Michael Steven Green on Citation Counts and Legal Philosophy:The acceptance ratios at any given law review are so law that the process has a significant dart-throwing quality about it already. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 7:53 am
It is not the purpose of oral proceedings in the context of proceedings for re-establishment to give the appellant a further chance to substantiate their factual assertions or to provide evidence despite the absence of factual assertions in the request for re-establishment. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:36 pm
On the other hand, as Steven Berk articulated in his post today, whistleblowers face ridicule, unemployment, and a convoluted legal system. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 11:14 pm
Steven C. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 9:22 pm
For everyone, there’s so much to talk about.When you’re watching trial scenes, notice the experts on the stand. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:26 am
According to Justice Kennedy, the Court is re-embracing the principle that a speaker's corporate identity is not a sufficient basis for suppressing political speech, as held in pre-Austin cases. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:15 pm
Steven Berk chimes in on Allen Stanford and, on LXBN TV, Max Kennerly explains why Sandra Fluke has a case for defamation against Rish Limbaugh. [read post]
