Search for: "In re That Portion of Lots 1 & 2"
Results 581 - 600
of 1,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2014, 7:30 pm
Your children will inherit 2/3 and your legal spouse 1/3 of whatever is left over. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am
“Personally” must be a reference to “by or under the authority of the author,” a requirement for a protectable fixation, and it is a rabbit hole I will not go down very far, except to say that the fraud claim and the “I authorized fixation” claim do not fit very well insofar as the fraud went to the sole reason Garcia authorized fixation.)Google argued that Garcia’s contribution to the film wasn’t sufficient to make her an author, because… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
And fourth, performance measures may simply be falsified. 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:29 pm
Not sure what to make of this, given its obvious applicability to Google’s publication of Garcia’s portion of the video. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:21 am
* * * What Measures to Choose The earlier discussion of how to define recidivism shows that a lot rides on choosing the outcome measures judiciously. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:06 am
Consequently, efforts should be made by owners and operators to ensure that: (1) there is an obvious accessible path from the street sidewalk to the entry; (2) a portion of the check-in counter in the main lobby of the hotel is appropriate for use by an individual who uses a wheelchair; (3) restaurants and bars have accessible pathways and accessible seating; (4) conference/meeting room entrances are wide enough for wheelchair passage; and (5) the main lobby has at least… [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Duell OK, now that you’re warmed up, no more softballs. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
The parties separated in 2/10. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 6:50 pm
In particular, the Office of Public Affairs at Treasury did a lot of digging for me. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 12:38 pm
The manufacturer could: (1) simply remove the ACS functionality altogether; or (2) raise the price to cover those additional costs; or (3) stop manufacture of the device altogether. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 1:15 pm
You’re not getting commissioners and de novo review because the statue doesn’t apply. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:09 am
The only problem is that a lot of employees didn’t check a box in Section 1 to indicate their status. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:09 am
The only problem is that a lot of employees didn’t check a box in Section 1 to indicate their status. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
My anecdotal take-aways from looking objectively at my own user habits in this regard: 1) video works; and 2) a strong spokesperson helps to put a human face on your organization and creates customer buy-in. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 pm
Sounds an awful lot like lawyers publishing a blog. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:20 pm
I’d focus on five things in the coming year. 1. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:45 am
“Real” law offices have lots of unnecessary, costly overhead such as: 1) oversized mahogany desks with bottles of booze in the top right drawer, 2) big law libraries chock full of dusty books, 3) lots of carbon paper right next to the typewriter (some even have bulky desktop computers and copiers), 3) a number of abacuses (or maybe even new-fangled calculators), 4) Rolodexes, 5) rows and rows of cabinets for reams of paper files, and 6) quill… [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
”1 Thus, the statute requires actual knowledge that a material misrepresentation had been made. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
These factors, obviously, will differ quite a lot among individuals. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 3:48 pm
Both Dan and Ed like the photo, so they re-post it and tweet it all over the internet. [read post]
