Search for: "In the Matter of: Kennedy"
Results 581 - 600
of 5,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 7:58 am
(This matters because at the time of Lucia's case before the SEC, the ALJs had not been appointed in a manner consistent with that clause.) [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
But it was argued in October, and the Court usually has all of its October opinions out long before June, no matter how controversial they are. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:07 pm
OK, if you insist, Deborah, a few predictions ... with the caveat that my track record on these matters has been decidedly mixed of late. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 6:22 am
Family matters: Tony Mauro reports that U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 1:10 pm
“It would be Kennedy’s legacy. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:34 am
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:26 am
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion was joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, and Kagan. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 3:19 pm
He, like Trump, rejects conventional wisdom (no matter how wise) and authority (however authorized)... [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 7:17 am
Lynn Hunt's History: Why it Matters is reviewed at the Los Angeles Review of Books. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
THE LIVES OF NON-AMERICANS OFTEN SEEM TO MATTER VERY LITTLE TO US POLICY MAKERS, INCLUDING, OF COURSE, THOSE WHO ARE THREATENING WAR WITH NORTH KOREA AND THE ALMOST CERTAIN "COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES" FOR OUR PUTATIVE ALLIES IN SOUTH KOREA WHO SEEM TO BE PLAYING NO REAL ROLE IN THE SABER RATTLING.] [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:56 pm
Are these questions to be answered as a matter of federal common law, or perhaps by borrowing a State’s choice-of-law rules? [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 6:02 am
In the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 6:40 am
Justice Kennedy’s opinion in Commil USA v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:10 pm
She was a Kennedy and the most popular First Lady of California ever. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
As Paul Kennedy at The Defense Rests pointed out earlier this year, however, it is sometimes tough to figure out if its author, Murray Newman, remembers that he is a defense lawyer and not a prosecutor. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:55 am
Simply as a matter of language, the referent of “this Constitution” is not at all unclear. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:00 am
Perhaps a longer view will reveal the context that matters so much in Establishment Clause cases: [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:01 am
[Infidels; DeLong; Newsweek; Media Matters spin (via Playbook)]. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
In cases challenging state definitions of marriage, he notes, the appropriate sovereign is simply regulating a matter it has always regulated. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm
Here are just some of the concerns raised by employing this doctrine now to save the IRS regulation. 1) As a threshold matter, this constitutional concern seems misplaced in the case that is before the Court. [read post]
